4000 yard TT

Photo from gallery: Triathlon - 2009

63:51 for 4000yds. Compare with my December 18 result two months ago: 68:19 for 4000yds. This is pace for a 67.5 minute Ironman swim. That’s a 6.5% improvement in my TT pace over the course of the last two months, and a whopping 14.3% over the course of the past 3 months which is my first datapoint doing 4000 yard TTs and corresponds to the beginning of when I started the increased focus on swim this winter. I had a quite strong negative split, -1.3% decoupling, but that’s partly due to me making a relatively significant effort increase during the second half. I wanted to make sure that I was going to finish my 4000 feeling absolutely confident that I had swum my fastest TT possible. The variability in this result is more consistent across the hour compared with that previous result and indicates that I didn’t loose focus at any point in the swim.

The keywords I was focusing on were to make the kicking count, and to swim with momentum. The first is to directly combat my tendency to only kick hard enough to maintain an acceptable body position. I’ve started to realize that my body position through the water is actually better when I’m kicking for propulsion rather than just kicking for body position. Like most aspects of triathlon it’s one of those things where when you work harder you go faster, but I’m starting to feel like there’s an efficiency improvement as well, so my return on investment for that effort is something I’m starting to consider worthwhile. The second is based on feedback from Erin, that I have to work pretty hard to get back up to speed every time I loose some of it, and that I’m best off to just keep the bits of speed that I’ve got. Right now that means two things for my swim stroke: 1) ensuring that I am not afraid to keep the arms moving, if I back off the arm-speed and focus more on getting long strokes excessively I am speeding up and slowing down with every stroke, an incredible waste of energy. 2) that after I push off the wall I’m going faster than swim speed, if I coast down to below swim speed before swimming I’m wasting energy, I’m best off to give a double kick and take a stroke before even thinking about breathing. Taking that first breath doesn’t break my body position in the water as much if it’s a mid-stroke breath, and hence I don’t loose that momentum.

The trendline is a per-kilometer average pace.

You might also like:

‘Nog Jog 2009

Slurp the ‘Nog… and don’t burp on the Jog

Rules:
You must drink 2 liters of full fat egg nog. The calorie count for the carton must exceed 2500 calories. Light egg nog therefore will not be permitted. The full carton must be brought unopened and un-tampered with to the start of the race. It must then be completely consumed, you may pour your egg nog into glasses or cups if you prefer but you must provide your own cups. Drinking from the carton is also permitted. Straws are not permitted.

When you complete your carton of egg nog you must exit the house, put on your shoes (no shoes inside) and run around the entire block that our house is on. The length of the run is approximately 720 meters. Running on the sidewalk or the road is permitted. Running will be completed in a counter-clockwise fashion, this permits maximal visibility during the finishing straightaway. It also provides an empty alleyway only one lot down the road for individuals who wish to remove themselves from formal competition after the first 10 steps of the run.

The winner will be selected as follows:
The first person to consume all egg-nog and run around the block with all of the egg nog in their stomach wins.

In the (extremely unlikely) event that no-one can complete the run with all of the egg-nog in their stomach, there will not be a winner, but the person who leaves the house first may be considered to have beat all of his/her competition.

Lore:

  • The first running of the ‘Nog Jog occurred following a mandarin orange swallowing contest. The result of the race proved that Reuben had indeed swallowed multiple segments of the orange without chewing.
  • The second running of the ‘Nog Jog resulted in egg-nog being ejected from a nose within the first five seconds.
  • Despite failing to complete the ‘Nog Jog in it’s proper format, all competitors of all previous years have continued on to pay their dues by encircling the block with a partial stomach of ‘Nog. If there is any etiquette in this tradition it is to respect the race, and making your way to the finish line is an honorable form of paying respect.

This year’s race occurred on the evening of December 23. 16 individuals arrived with their egg-nog in hand and competed in the race. The kitchen was more than full, as more spectators arrived than competitors. Racing began at 10:37pm. The first complete 2 liters was consumed 63 seconds later and the first egg-nog was ejected from a stomach less than a minute after that. The race was completed by only 4 individuals of the 16 competing.

Results:

  1. Josh*
  2. Reuben
  3. Jacob**

*Fastest chug (1:03) and fastest run (3:03) of the evening.
**Jacob was making his ‘Nog Jog debut, as was 4th place Trenton. Andrew was awarded an honorable mention for fastest unofficial finisher, completing with less than two liters contained in his stomach.

The footage follows:

You might also like:

4000 TT

This is for Dave Roberts:

Photo from gallery: Triathlon - 2009

68:19 for 4000yds. This is pace for a 72 minute Ironman swim. Not a lot else to say, -0.2% decoupling is not bad. Effort certainly did drift up. Started out paying attention to Jan in the next lane, not bad to start out a bit hard, that’s how it goes on race day too so I don’t mind doing it in practice. My watch wasn’t running correct so I needed to fix it after 500m. I felt quite smooth from 750m through about 2000 and then needed to concentrate quite hard. Variability in pace reflects this, dialed in well early on, gets a bit shaky and then control is regained once I switched counting “up” to counting “down” and pace is excellent to finish off.

The trendline is a per-kilometer average pace.

You might also like:

The Swimgame concludes

The swimgame concluded this afternoon even though technically I could score two more points if I made it to a pool tomorrow and swam 4000. I’ve got an MRI scheduled though and one of the stipulations is that I’m not allowed to have exercised earlier in the day. So be it, I certainly met my goal of scoring 20 points and am content to leave it at that. Plus I don’t want to make it too tough on myself to break my record if I decide to follow through and actually do do another swim camp sometime later this winter.

The totals were 38.8k and 13hours 27minutes in the pool over the course of two weeks. Those totals occurred over 6 days each week and the second was larger than the first: 18750 & 20050. At the moment I’m ranked 11th in the competition out of 34 people. I think I’ll get passed yet by one or two people. Only two people will have scored all 41 points available. I could actually imagine doing that now, I certainly couldn’t two weeks ago but I’ve definitely brought my swimming to a new level with this camp. Hopefully I’m diligent in keeping the volume up and with one or two more real surges in swimming focus over the winter I can imagine making a few more breakthroughs and might end up placing better in the swim than on the run at a triathlon next summer. That would really be cool.

I tried the twitter thing for the past two weeks and it still seems just about as dumb as before I started. It’s a great way to waste time though. In any case, here are my swimgame tweets outlining progress through the camp…

  • @EnduranceCorner – I’ll be playing the #swimgame starting Nov 23. I’m setting the goal today = to score 20 points.
  • Finished first swim of the #swimgame 2600 for 1 point. Club swim so no bonus pts: 12×125 as 50drill&75swim with 15sec rest as mainset.
  • #swimgame Day 2. 2000TT today, 34:46 & split of 17:32 so -ve split to boot! Count as 2×1000 descend on 0sec rest? Don’t think so. 3 pts tot
  • #swimgame D3 2100 as 6×200 on 3:29 3:30 3:23 3:29 3:26: 3:28 then 300 suicide set w/ p-ups and s-ups each 25. tot 4 pts: swim yet tonight.
  • Second swim of D3 for #swimgame. 10×200 broken as 4/3/2/1 descending, range 3:35 to 3:23 last sprint in 3:04. 2 pts & 6 tot
  • #swimgame is killing me and I love it. I surpassed my biggest weekly distance ever today with 2×1000 on 17:50 & 17:04. 8pts tot.
  • Actually 9 pts tot, that was my 5th swim of the week, I’ll do at least two more this week so the #swimgame scoresheet will display correct.
  • two more #swimgame points, longest swim ever, 4000! Depending how I feel I might do it again tomorrow. Fastest of 7×300 in 4:19. 11pts tot
  • #Swimgame Day6. 4000 conts in 1:13:30. Outside-tops of shoulders ache, never ached there before, I didn’t know I could?! 14 pts total.
  • Week 2 of #swimgame kicked off with longest swim of my life. 4200 and 30×100 as main set. On pace for bonus set until last 5. 3 pts:17 tot!
  • #swimgame D9, 5×400 on 7:01, 7:00, 6:54, 6:44, 6:16. 2 pts today, 19 tot. Feel for water improving, 4th 400 felt awesome, normally I’d fade.
  • #Swimgame Day 10, 1500 drills for 0 points. Moving too slow and ran out of time to score.
  • 2600 for #swimgame as 5x(300pull 200swim). Focus on breathing from hip, coach’s orders! 21pts tot
  • 2000 band/buoy for #swimgame: 24 pts. First swim with band, found it difficult to swim with much effort- I realize my balance is quite poor.
  • 3750 for #swimgame, main set racing Ben 1/2/3/4/5/4/3/1 (00s). Final sprint deeply anaerobic, 7 people cheering on deck, called as a tie.
  • #swimgame last bonus: 8x(25flykick 25 sidekick 100swim 100pull) Mrs. Physio said fly-arms are no go. +1000band took all I’ve got. 4000tot.
  • #swimgame is over for me: no exercise prior to the MRI is allowed tomorrow. 38800 swum. 31/41 points scored. Certainly made my goal of 20!

So what changed? After 4 days of daily swimming I showed up for tri-club practice on Friday and felt ready to hammer. I was feeling quick in the pool and stuck on the tail end of the train a lane up from where I would normally swim. I really felt like I had developed a feel for what makes a good catch and what doesn’t. I had worked all week on making my long arms work to my advantage by taking a really long reach. Erin even noticed, I was reaching better – focus and dedication was paying off with muscle memory. I took a day off mid-way and the constant ache that I had developed in my shoulders and back had started to wane. Week two was all about developing strength, once I had a better catch I was far from strong enough to pull on it with any speed. To say that I managed to get strong during week two is totally bogus, but I continued to benefit from the volume by putting good muscle memory into my arms. I also identified that I was cheating on good balance by swimming with wide feet. The two band-swims that I’ve done really highlighted that I don’t have very good balance in the water. I need to really work on that to maintain a streamlined position in the water, and part of that is improving core strength. So, 13.5 hours in the pool basically gave me good reason to keep swimming, and concrete tasks to work on. I’m totally pleased with this endeavor, even though it may have turned into a make-work project.

I’ll conclude with a plot of my weekly distance over the period of when I started shoulder rehabilitation last fall up until the present. The past two weeks both doubled my longest distance in any week prior to that. [click it for larger]

distance plot for swim

You might also like:

Spring Thaw Triathlon

Episode #1

I am acting as race director of the 2010 edition of the race. If you are at all interested or capable please contact me. If you’re interested in racing and not volunteering please at least consider volunteering… and then if you decide that you cannot volunteer but do want to race, then maybe check out the “Spring Thaw Triathlon” page at www.ualberta.ca/~tri for more information. Registration is not open yet and it will not be until March 2010.

You might also like:

Friel’s Seasonal Summary

Tri club collectively designed training plans for the 2010 season this evening. While mine has generally been designed, it is not complete. I have a good idea regarding foci for the different seasons and for periodization through until the end of April I’m sticking with the triathlon club’s regime. This is completely a matter of convenience, as it allows me to push it when my friends are pushing it and take it easy when they’re taking it easy. I also don’t have to pretend to coach one kind of workout while I do a different one myself, which is just a silly idea. In any case, as I have moved into my first base weeks of the year and am slowly working on continuing to develop the training plan to beat all others. Being that season of the year, the whole world seems to be discussing this stuff, lots of it is crap. It’s hard to sift the free insight from the for-sale products, but I did run across a good suggestion from Joe Friel. It follows.

Stolen Sourced from Joe Friel’s website:

Success in sport is just like success in any other aspect of your life. One of the requirements is careful planning. Deciding where you want to go in the future begins with knowing where you have been in the past. Recognizing trends and evaluating what you’ve been doing are both important steps on the path to racing better next year. This process can be accomplished in several ways. Talking with your coach or a trusted training partner is probably the best way. But lacking such people in your sporting life you can still accomplish the same end by answering some key questions. Here are some I often use. Your answers can lead in many different directions. Ultimately, the reason for such an exercise is to give you more focus when it comes to training and racing. It may even help you to decide why it is you devote so much of your life to training.

Here are five questions to answer at the end of your race season and before starting to prepare for the coming season:

  1. What was the high point of your season? Why does this stand out for you? Was it what you thought it would be at the start of the season?

Quite clearly the highseason of the season was the month of June. While it culminated with me winning the Chinook Half triathlon near the end fo the month I trained excellently in the previous weeks and felt like I was very successful at many workouts. I was swimming faster than I thought I was able to be swimming at many workouts. My run pace was quick, despite not having a huge run volume in the previous couple months, and I was logging very impressive bike rides without getting as fatigued as I possibly should have been. I was racing well at the Tuesday night mountain bike races (threshold efforts), won a time-trial and managed a solid 200kms on my bike towing a trailer into a headwind at the end of a solid 4 day training block. I entered what I thought was a test-taper, but tapered well, hitting workout intensity accurately and cutting weight. On race morning I felt like I had eliminated fatigue but hadn’t recouped freshness, indicating I hadn’t over rested. I spent time during race week getting mentally prepared for race day and I then nailed the race, overcame the race day obstacles of a killer headwind, cramps and hot temperatures on the run. Ultimately I surpassed expectations and put together a race to be proud of.

This period of my season was supposed to be my buildup towards race fitness. I hoped to peak at the end of July, having added cycling prowess first and running speed second during the period of coming to maximal fitness for Calgary 70.3. It doesn’t surprise me at all that I was fast on the bike at this point in the season because I had hoped to be reaching my cycling peak earlier in the year but in retrospect I was impressed at how fast I was able to run at Chinook Half. At the time I thought I was primed to be adding some serious run speed to my fitness portfolio in the next six weeks and hoped to cut my half marathon time by ~8 minutes for the next race.

  1. What was your greatest disappointment? Why did this happen? Is there anything you could have done to have avoided it?

The disappointing aspect of the season was my inability to get any faster at running during the month of July. I felt like I had designed a program for myself that was aimed at working on my limiters. I completed exactly the workouts I wanted to complete for three consecutive weeks of my run program. In retrospect I had misidentified what was holding me back from running faster. I was convinced that it was durability in my muscles that I needed to improve after suffering cramps at Chinook Half. I felt like what I needed to run fast was the ability to run tough. Knowing that my goal of running ~1:32 for the half marathon at the end of the 70.3 did not actually amount to running fast I was certain that I would be alright without doing much fast running. The issue was that running 1:32 although not fast, was faster than I had run a standalone half-marathon (Maybe I could have, maybe I couldn’t have, I hadn’t tried). In retrospect I was focusing on extending my ability to run longer along my current speed potential curve than I was at improving my speed potential curve.

    Quick note -A speed potential curve is the curve you get if you try predict other distance race performances from a single distance race performance (or a couple performances) and plot them on a graph: Depending on your method you’ll likely get a curve – try it. If your curve is a straight line it means your prediction method is bogus, it should curve. If your body listened to what you drew on paper, the best strategy would be to get awful fast at 400 yard sprints you’ll be able to draw a better curve, and you’d in theory be a great marathoner. That theory would be a bad theory. In general though, your ability to run fast at 5kms should translate to run fast at 21.1 kms with the caveat that you run with sufficient weekly volume. Extending the longest distance you can run on your speed potential curve requires doing tougher long runs and long volume. Shifting your speed potential curve towards faster running requires doing those shorter and faster runs. A balanced approach to training sees you do some of each, but at any one point in time it may be most appropriate to focus on one or the other.

Whether or not I could have improved my run speed during July with a different run training focus might not be the only question. I spent July rather tired in comparison to May and June, I felt on occasion that I was trying to stick it out until August and then I’d get a break. That feeling I don’t believe was a symptom of my choice of training focus, it was more likely a symptom of where I was in my season as a whole. I think it’s pretty clear looking back that I had come to a rather sharp peak in my season at this point in time. Cutting weight going into Chinook half was a dumb idea, it likely extended my recovery from the race as well as made July tougher on me than it should have. I was trying to do some of my hardest training when I was already in my best shape. This is something Chris McCormack has talked about on and off, but I haven’t actually read much on the topic from people in exercise physiology. Not because I haven’t tried. I imagine these sorts of things would be terribly difficult to study, there are a million variables and unfortunately (for the researchers) one of the largest is probably motivation. Chris McCormack is also a big guy and his comments went like this, paraphrased of course because I have no idea where to begin looking for a direct quote: I often came into Roth [Late Aug] very light, and then tried to do my kona training while in excellent shape. That didn’t work because I had nothing left to improve as I built towards Kona. I learned that if I went into Roth feeling a bit flabby and out of shape I could still race well, maybe I’d have a hard time running sub 2:50, but it meant that when I started my Kona block I had a little bit extra to give. I’d come into Kona feeling fast and light and that’s what counts. endquote

Cutting 7 lbs during my taper into that race was also not the reason I stagnated in improvement at that point in my season. It’s quite possible that I was just extending my season for too long. Late February and early March had seen some of my biggest weeks ever in terms of dedicated training as I put together a key block of building towards the Yakima River Canyon Marathon. I had taken the shortest break possible after my marathon before getting back to training, everyone’s talk of how much time it takes to recover from a marathon had seemed like a challenge to me: how fast can I recover and get back to putting in big weeks? What that meant was, that I had tied the early season run focus directly into my summer triathlon focus. Taking minimal break probably made me run faster at my mid-season race but cost me the ability to keep building fitness into my end of season race.

  1. Looking back, do you think you trained as wisely and as hard as you could have trained?

Without re-hashing the wise-ness of all my decisions relating to my disappointment in ability to continue running improvement through July I’ll comment on training “Hard” through the different months. I felt like I trained extremely hard during March. I was putting together a tough run program while at the same time coaching a tough bike program which I participated in with the triathlon club. March’s goal was to build muscular endurance on the bike and it meant for some hard sessions, combined with running longer than I had ever run before and with more volume than I had ever run before this made for a tough month. My swim frequency suffered as a result. March needed to be a hard month, and thus it was, I wouldn’t say it was too hard though. April was a fun month, I was reaping the benefits of a tough March (fitness wise) and was hitting key workouts hard and reveling the ability to finally get outside in good weather. At the time I didn’t feel like I was close to any limits of my ability to train but I was probably training too hard, not taking as long a break after the marathon as I maybe should have makes this month count as a net “too hard“. I backed off a bit in May from the aggressiveness of training in April knowing that I didn’t need to get too fast too soon. This probably saved me totally crashing in July, probably perfect execution this month. June I hit hard, no questions asked and July I probably tried too hard again! During July especially I was accumulating too much fatigue during the week for me to recover during easy sessions. I was replacing days completely off with easy swims or easy bike rides when I probably should have taken complete rests. Then I raced Calgary 70.3 and the triathlon season came to a close, of the 5 previous months I had netted too hard twice but never too easy, is there any secret I didn’t feel like I could perform my best?

Early August was a complete break and that was great, I didn’t want to train and I hardly did for two weeks. I then followed that up with a super challenging bike trip at the end of the month (Too hard – but that was exactly the idea) and tried to ease into Cyclocross season. I was successful at easing into Cyclocross season as I improved significantly through the course of the season fitness-wise, not just skill wise. It probably took a while for me to reap the benefits of that big bike trip but once I did my TT strength was definitely there. It took until the Blow Street Cross race before I put together my best race of the ‘cross season. Had I not gone down with piggy-flu I might have peaked for provincials, who knows. I’m confident I structured the intensity of training properly following my break in August.

  1. What is the one thing you most need to work on for next season in order to perform better?

The race by which 2010 will be measured is Ironman Canada. That’s a fact that I can’t avoid, so while I’d like to take a good run at a few road races, maybe upgrade to Cat3, hammer hard at two half ironman races I have planned, set some PRs at the spring cross country race series and an early season half marathon, stick with the racing-pack at the Tuesday night social mountain bike races, and maybe place top 50 at the national TT championship, it is necessary to make the metrics for 2010 performance relate to Ironman Canada.

Of secondary importance on that day, I need to do quite a bit of work swimming to make that swim reasonably comfortable. To me, that requires technique improvement and swimming endurance. That is only going to be solved by bumping up my swim volume and continuing to accept feedback in the pool. This is currently why my shoulders ache from swimgame, it’s going to be a comfy 2.4 miles on race morning.

Primary importance on race day however, is my ability to run home with a good marathon. It needs to improve significantly from where I’m at right now. Based on my experience this summer I felt that once I was into the triathlon season my speed was capped. I could bump up endurance and my ability to run off the bike, and even my ability to run hills under control improved this summer, but my speed did not. I need to bring myself to a new level of running speed during the off season so that once the triathlon season gets going in full force next spring (when weekends start to be taken up by long bike rides and weekly volume gets stupid large) I don’t find myself trapped at running one pace and stagnate through the season. I need to have the capacity (base fitness, coordination, power, efficiency, pacing skills) for a far faster marathon than I have at the moment if I have hopes of running ~7:3X miles along Skaha. That will come with doing threshold run work in the off season allowing me to build into longer endurance runs when it counts next summer. For those 15-20 milers to wind up being fast, I need to start out with faster short runs in the early season.

  1. What would you most like to accomplish next season? Is it a good stretch and yet within your reach if you do things right?

I will run the entire marathon at Ironman Canada August 29, 2010.

You might also like:

Swimgame

I’m competing at the swimgame competition being virtually hosted by Gordo Byrn at EnduranceCorner for the next two weeks (November 23rd to December 6th). There are no restrictions on who can join and there is no requisite speed to swim any of the sets. Slow-squid are on equal footing for point scoring as fast-fish. The pool of competitors is supposed to be twittering their #swimgame progress as they swim into the @EnduranceCorner/swimgame list. I guess the idea is that you get to brag as you go how many points you’re earning, it’s not for accountability purposes as far as I know.

Points are earned each time a swim of 2000m/2200yds is completed and this forms the basis of the competition, swim frequency is goal number one. From there on there are incentives to score more points as the 14 days go by. Points are earned as follows:

  1. Your minimum swim distance is 2000m/2200 yds. Each time you hit that distance, give yourself a point.
  2. We decided that 4000m/4400 yds merits special recognition, each time you hit that distance in a single workout give yourself a point.
  3. Five swims in a week gives you a bonus point, each week.
  4. Ten swims across the camp gives you another bonus point.
  5. A bonus point for completing each of the following:
    1. 5×400, on 20s rest each swim faster than the one before
    2. 2×1000 on your choice rest, second 1000 faster than the one before
    3. 4000 meters/4400 yards without stopping – all three-stroke breathing
    4. 10×200 group them 4/3/2/1 and speed up for each group. Take no more than 15s rest on each 200.
    5. 8×250 as 25 fly, 225 choice – you decide the rest
    6. 2000 meters/2200 yards with pullbuoy and band. The band should be a rubber band (say an old bike tube, cut the valve out) and tight around the ankles. I recommend this is done continuous, three-stroke breathing. However, if you can’t manage continuous then I think you still deserve the point if you do the distance.
    7. 2000 TT for time – this is a great benchmark to have. You get the point for doing the TT – the split time is for future reference. Compare your speed for the first 200 against your speed for the entire swim – you will learn something about your ability to pace.
    8. 20×100 – take your average 100 split from the 2000 TT and add 10s to it. For example, if you swam 30 minutes for your 2000 then the average per 100 is 1:30. Adding 10 seconds is 1:40. So you would swim 20×100 leaving on 1:40. The goal is to be slightly faster that your TT time – in this case swimming ~1:27. You don’t need to be faster to get the point – I just wanted to give you a target for how to play the effort. You’ll likely start WAY too fast – know that we tend to repeat our patterns in races so this is a good workout to learn how to control yourself early.

I’ll post again in two weeks with my progress on this project.

You might also like:

Power Testing

Power testing on the bike for Triathlon Club begins this weekend. Here’s some inspiration:

Photo from gallery: Weblog Photos

You might also like:

Ironman: t minus one year

The big reason for the bike trip was to make my way out to Penticton to sign up for Ironman for 2010. That is now done and on August 29, 2010 I’ll embark on what I can almost guarantee will be the most challenging day of swimming, biking and running I’ve ever done. I’m really looking forward to it. This blog entry is mostly notes for myself for next year, not terribly stimulating reading, so if you read it and get to the end thinking ‘what a waste of my time’, then don’t complain because you’ve been warned.

I was stationed in OK falls for the 2009 edition of Ironman Canada to be the support crew for two friends who would be racing on Sunday morning. They had a lot of tasks to do associated with race preparation and when they weren’t busy it was important that I didn’t try to distract them too much from their most important task in the days prior to the race: relaxing and letting all the fatigue drain out of their muscles. Despite having ridden almost continuously during my waking hours for the past 7 days I still opted to get out and make the most of the excellent riding terrain by doing another ride. I really wanted to ride the IMC course while there so that I could mentally log it in my head in advance of actually heading out on the course. I found that it is a huge advantage to actually ride courses prior to racing on them. I didn’t used to think this was terribly important but this spring when I started to do more mountain biking I realized the importance. Knowing what is coming up and having done the corners before makes it so much easier to ride with confidence. That makes a huge difference in actual speed when the course is technical and the experience lets you ride faster… on a triathlon course it’s probably not going to make a huge time difference but the confidence that it adds is significant in my opinion. I have an excellent mental image of the ride and know where I’ll likely feel strong and where I’ll likely need to focus hard to ride efficiently. If you ask me it’s completely reasonable to suggest that pre-riding the course this year made me 5 minutes faster on it next year. If I could train there on all my training rides I think I’d gain another couple minutes just by getting so familiar with the pacing demands of this course, irrespective of fitness. At an Olympic or sprint distance race the difference is likely only a matter of a few seconds, because there is only one pace – HARD… but for IM I think this is likely a significant advantage because the pace is never hard.

I had it in my head that I should leave the hotel in OK falls at around 8:30 pm so I’d be on the middle section of the course at the same time of day as I would be for race day. But being lazy in the morning was more important and so I took my sweet time to get out there, meaning I’d ride a bit more in the heat of the afternoon instead. I rode from the Penticton Beach down along Shaha and then up the short climb over McClean Creek and the fast curvy descent into OK Falls the previous afternoon. The start is just fine, quick and fast, the first climb is short enough that even though I probably won’t ride it in as controlled a manner as I probably should it’s not going to take a big toll on myself. The road is winding and the surface is less than ideal so it’s likely that the traffic on the course will cause some trouble here. I figure that if I can swim 70 minutes I’ll have had a good go of it, that would put 800 people ahead of me. Add only a couple minutes to that and I’ll have a thousand people ahead of me. It’s clear that I’m planning on hopping out of the water when the pack of triathletes will be at it’s thickest. The point all that is: by the time I’m at McClean Creek Road people will be settled in on their bikes and riding predictably and I’ll likely be ready to make some serious passes, maybe a hundred on this climb alone. I have reason to believe that I’ll be riding at a steady+ pace or high zone three here, getting through some of this crowd is going to probably help calm me down, it’s early in the course, not a long hill, and adrenaline is guaranteed to be high.

The roll south from OK Falls to Osoyoos was not dead flat like everyone describes. There were plenty of short rises along the way, I felt like they make this section of the course quite dangerous, not because they put you in any danger, but they offer a relentless barrage of opportunities to go hard for 30 seconds. If the mentality through this section is not well controlled it is completely possible that I get caught up with the huge number of cyclists who I’ll be tearing down the road with and just muscle my way up all those little hills. Deadpan flat would be fast and in one way would be dangerous because I’d feel like I had a significant advantage to push a big gear and use my momentum to my advantage, but this terrain is likely worse because each potential effort is effort is less than a minute, and each can be justified alone, but added together they present an opportunity to shatter your ability to run that afternoon. The key for this section is patience, probably the most here out of the entire course.

Once through Osoyoos, Richter Pass is exactly like everyone describes. It comes in four stages, each being about the same grade with either a downhill roll or flat stretch between them. There is tons and tons of room on the road here and taking the climb easy is no problem. Likely ride each section seated and finishing out of the saddle before trying to get aero and crank the speed back up on the flat sections interspersing the climb. Descending this pass is fantastic, it’s a straight shot down the back and 80 kph is basically guaranteed in the aero position with deep wheels. Immediately out of this descent the infamous rollers begin and they’re what makes this bike course hard. Again, the opportunity to go hard here is dangerously readily available; luckily each hill is long enough that you’re not likely to do so (hammer) accidentally. I’ll be doing the same drills all spring and summer that I did this year to improve my efficiency on the rollers. Seated climb into standing climb, get aero on the top and get up to speed, soft pedal the downhill in a big gear and recover, ride through the gears on the beginning of the ascent making sure I don’t push any of them too hard and settle in on the climb at a moderate pace. This is a tough section to ride and saying that I’m going to actually take it easy here is impossible, or I’m just lying. Taking this section actually easy means you’ll be here all day. I do need to try and take it as easy as possible though. That means I really have to work on riding rollers for the 2010 season, it needs to become a strength of mine. I am great at riding blazing fast on the flats already at 80rpm for hours at a time but I need to continue to develop my skills on the short climbs at variable cadence. I don’t need to get fast on the equivalent of the Great White North Half Ironman course, I need to get efficient on the IMC course.

After the rollers end the rest of the ride really plays to my strengths. There is a long and flat stretch all the way to Keremeos, the focus here is staying aero and likely pushing a big gear. Keeping it totally controlled I’ll be allowing myself to ride relatively fast contingent on the conditions that I am keeping up with nutrition and feeling like this is an easy effort. The out and back isn’t as flat as the first traverse of the valley but it’s generally flat. Many people get bored here according to reports. That’s not something I typically deal with while riding and if I stay focused here I can imagine that I’ll be riding my way past some more quick swimmers in this section especially if there is some wind to contend with that will make the non disciplined triathletes loose focus and perhaps get out of the aerobars.

The course leaves the valley it was in and heads up towards Yellow Lake. It’ll be dangerous to think of the climb having started as soon as the turn is made, it doesn’t. The grade isn’t flat anymore but it’s probably best to think of it as just a hillier section of the out and back until I pass the turnoff to the Green Mountain Road. At this point there is a climb on highway 3A that lasts three miles and it’s a real climb. To think of Keremeos to Yellow Lake as one long 20km ascent will absolutely shatter any positive thoughts you had going for you, the real climb is short and only 5% and I’m sure it’ll be loaded with spectators. Riding that 3 mile section at a moderate effort is A-OK but not the entire 20 km. I’ll maintain my out-and-back race plan through to the beginning of the steep section, stay focused and ride steady. Hitting the top of the short climb it’s time to load up my bottle cages with all the weight I can scavenge from the volunteers handing out gatorade and water because it’s a long fast descent. I’ll probably try to eat a pseudo-meal at this point in the ride. It’ll be sometime around noon and I have 25km or half an hour left to go on the ride. I’m thinking somewhere around 500-700 calories at this point including an entire bottle of gatorade and then follow it with just water on the run down to Penticton. It’s a stress free ride down that hill and I can give my digestive system some time to work. I’ll definitely run an 11 tooth ring here and it’s an easy cruise, low cadence, take it easy and have some fun.

What I learned about the Bike course on Saturday by riding it I feel like I learned about the run course on Sunday by watching it. That’s not to say I know everything there is to know, but I learned so much about Ironman running by watching this race that it felt like I was ready to give it a try. Looking at the faces on people leaving transition it seemed obvious who was headed out there with mostly just hope of running 26.2 miles, those who knew they were going to run 26.2 miles, and those who were already considering the possibilities of not finishing or walking a huge stretch of the run. The difference quite clearly was not who looked fresh and who looked tired, no-one looked fresh and everyone looked tired. Ironman marathon running has basically nothing to do with marathon running in my opinion. The only thing that’s the same is that you have to run for 26.2 miles. I learned basically that I am going to be starting that run feeling tired and that it wasn’t a matter of maybe getting 15 miles into the run and having to run 10 miles tired. Marathon running in my experience is all about 20 miles of warming up and taking it easy and then 10 kilometers of a real push through to the finish. I had guessed that maybe this would be the same deal except the hold-on section of the run would just be way longer. It’s not like that at all, not the first part nor the second part. Everyone was starting with the look of fatigue in their faces and no-one has the potential to jus run hard for 3+ hours. This was true for people getting off of their bikes after a 1 hour swim and 5 hour ride almost to the same extent as for people getting off their bikes after 90 minutes in the water and 7 or 8 hours on the bike, you start the marathon tired. This is a fact.

People who likely were going to end up walking looked in really rough shape, no surprises. The difference between people who look like they’re likely to be successful and those who are maybe going to be successful is all about efficiency and focus. Some people look to be running along in fine form but their faces just look like they’re shell shocked, they were looking scared, eyes wandering all over the place at the crowds, fiddling with their fuel belts. adjusting and re-adjusting their racing clothes. I think a lot of them have thoughts going through their heads like ‘the end of Skaha is a long ways away from here’… followed shortly by ‘oh man, that’s only halfway’. The people who looked like they were on track for success were focused and just running. Many of them had smiles on their faces and it seemed to me that their focus was down the road, not to the end of the valley, they were blocking out all of the unnecessary stimuli. When the first AG athletes started to come back into town they looked exactly the same as they did when they went out. Their motion was unbelievably efficient and their focus was identical to how they looked on the way out. These were the people who managed to hop off their bikes and do exactly the same thing for 3 and a bit hours. It wasn’t about starting out, running a ways and then pushing really hard to the finish, these guys started out and were consistent for 26.2 miles. They were successful because they didn’t have to slow down and that’s it. The guys who came back into town two or three hours after that likely weren’t lacking as good of a race plan or pacing or likely even fitness. What separated them was the fact that they did not have the durability in their legs to set out and do exactly the same thing for 3.5 hours, which was run at a reasonable, even and controlled pace. Running was hard from step one until they got to the finish chute, but the ‘hardness’ was all difficulty and never effort. Marathon running has an effort level that necessarily picks up at the end to hold that ‘best physical limitation’ pace through the finish, from my observations Ironman running has a mental effort level that necessarily picks up at the end to just keep going.

Nutrition for Ironman no longer seems terribly complicated. Nutrition for the bike in my opinion is all about keeping enough calories in my stomach that I am forcing my stomach to absorb as much fuel as it possibly can. This means eating as much as it takes to keep me on the edge of starting to get full. In my experience that’s 400-450 calories per hour, no problem. I’ll eat a bunch at the top of yellow lake and let my stomach work through that for the last half hour on the bike mostly because I know I’ll be doing more than 50 kph for much of the descent and am unlikely to eat well, I finish off without having depleted myself and not a full stomach, but likely still some food in there. Getting on the run it’s going to be so hot that I can likely drink and drink and drink. Lots of that is going to be coke and gatorade, some gels in the mix if I am also drinking water which at the moment I think is probably unlikely, I’ll just be chugging gatorade. Nutrition on the run is actually pretty simple once I realized that to be successful the goal is just to hang in there and not slow down. That formula means: do what it takes not to slow down, stay cool, drink, run, drink, run, eat if I can, drink, run, stay cool, run, run, run. I’ll easily be getting 300 calories per hour on the run just by drinking if it’s hot, there is nothing complicated here. This was a relief to observe, figuring out nutrition has been of great interest to me thus far during my triathlon involvement and it’s something I’m pretty good at. Also note that what I might think is actually really simple is not super straightforward, the point being though that fueling during Ironman is guaranteed not to be more complicated than anything I’ve done before which is what I was expecting. I thought I had a big learning curve and the answer is no. Now that I know this, I think the only thing more complicated than what I’ve already done is nutrition for RAAM. No plans are set yet!

Going fast at Ironman actually seems simpler than going fast at a half Ironman. At the half distance the idea is to try and shave off just enough of your speed at each event from their stand-alone PB times that when you put them together you get to the finish as fast as you can. That means that you have lots and lots of things in the balance. You’re going pretty hard on the bike so you’ll get stomach aches if you try to eat too much. You can deal with cramping on the run because you really stressed your muscles on the bike to move fast. At Ironman, you swim, then you go for a slow bike ride during which you have to stay focused on the task at hand but never need to move quickly, you can eat lots of whatever you want because you’re not going too hard. Then you get off the bike, you’re tired and you have a long ways to go. What makes you fast is that you start out of the gates doing what you can do for the entire run, likely by the time you’re a few aid stations in you’ve got your pattern down and you do exactly that for the rest of the day. The concept of performing at the edge of your physical capacity does not look to be a component of Ironman success whatsoever. Ironman success is based on consistency, durability, focus, determination, self control. On race day that’s about all you need, and lots of those things don’t require training, they require learning. The one training based component, also the thing that I think has the potential to make me relatively quick is durability. I don’t have durability for Ironman running yet, I’ve got Ironman durability on the bike but no humanly possible bike ride can make up for slowing down on the Marathon and needing to walk a few miles. I also recognize that the durability that I’ve developed is not heat-proof. I need an asbestos coated durability for Penticton. So that’s all I’ve got to do in training: learn how to be a durable runner. Then do some fun stuff in training (on the bike or on bike-run bricks) that forces me to come face to face with my ability to stay focused, my determination to complete hard workouts, and self control to stay reserved in my efforts. That’s the recipe, if it bakes a good cake, then this blog post might be more interesting than I had first guessed it might be.

You might also like:

Calgary 70.3 race review

Overall the organizers of the Calgary 70.3 deserve congratulations for an amazing race. The course was fantastic, no-one got lost, no-one drown, the sunrise was absolutely spectacular and the spectators along parts of the course were thick and loud!

An inaugural event is always going to have a few hitches along the way. Overall though I think that the organizers of this event were able to get almost everything right on the first try that would have made for significant trouble for some people, their oversights were mostly limited to less important things and made for inconvenience rather than trouble.

  • Information – Information was hard to find and relatively late in being posted. Examples: swim start times were posted in different places having different information all the way up to and including race morning. The whole question mark about whether or not we were allowed to have shoes on our bikes was a nightmare, no-one had ever heard of such a rule before and it was impossible to find someone with the correct information. Having nothing on the ground in T1 is appropriate, leave no shoes on the ground in T1, but if they’re on the pedals they cannot be tripped over. Especially with the long run-out like we had across the gravel this makes a big difference. Information regarding the actual distance of the bike course was tough to sleuth out… more on this later. Stating that there would be aid stations every mile and then changing your mind to put them every 2 km isn’t a big problem but just making a decision and sticking with it would have been preferred if you ask me.

  • Package Pickup – Occured Downtown at the Westin Hotel. The Westin Hotel hopefully was a significant cash sponsor of the event because forcing all of the athletes to come down to that location caused a ton more grief than it needed to. The organization of the package pickup was streamlined and efficient once we figured out what was going on.
  • Bike Drop Off – Worked out well enough for people with cars, I can’t comment on behalf of out of town visitors or Calgary athletes who choose not to drive. Having the bike shop sponsor out at the T1 during bike drop off would have been nice. There was a lot of tool sharing going on in the parking lot amongst athletes who were making adjustments and assembling bikes, having Speed Theory put out a table with some tools to use would be a nice perk. They were there race morning helping out some frazzled athletes but when you’re encouraging everyone to get their bikes into the corral a day early it also makes sense to have them there at that time.
  • Toilets – I don’t know how many Porta-Potties you need. The goal of course shouldn’t be to make it so that there is no line because that is probably excessive but the amount of time that some people spent in those line-ups was unreal. The toilets that were associated with T1 were still being used by athletes whose waves had not started once the race was underway, I saw athletes waiting for toilets while their times were running.
  • Associated with the above: The volunteers should have been more forceful in not allowing people to use those toilets. This was a theme of the day, the volunteers knew what they were doing and did an excellent job but they were almost too nice about it on occasion. At volunteer orientation it is important to give them a bit of empowerment, tell them that they can give directions and be strict about things when necessary otherwise business minded triathletes can be a bit too greedy.
  • Swim Course: Great water, the course was probably over-hyped for potential for being cold, but another year could prove me wrong. Good decision to keep us out of the wide open part of the lake as it kept the waves down. Also nice to swim under the bridge and back, excellent for spectators. Sighting was no problem along the course except for coming back in the last 400m to the finish at the boat ramp. All of the sailboats parked made a nightmare for sighting, when you looked up all you saw were sailboats that all looked the same. Perhaps flying a big flag or banner would help aim us to the finish correctly. The swim start and finish lanes crossed right through eachother. Having everyone jump off the left side of the boat launch into the water there might be a better plan and sending them off behind one of the collections of sailboats directly for the bridge would have resulted in no course overlap and no skull to skull collisions.
  • T1 – excellent layout, it meant for a bit longer run than some alternative configurations may have made possible but the short bike rack lengths made sure that no lane was ever too busy at once. I watched lots of people sitting down in the dirt during T1 before I started, I do T1 without ever sitting but for those people that are planning to sit it would have been nice if there were chairs along the fence for them to make use of. Having room on the carpet across the gravel parking lot for athletes to pass one another would have been nice. The single file chute meant that I had to walk for 200m behind a little traffic jam.
  • Bike Course – Excellent course, excellent marking, excellent volunteers with directions, excellent suggestions for where people could spectate. My frustration was that by November 2008 I had figured out that this bike course was going to be somewhere between 94 and 96 kilometers but no-where was this ever stated. The website consistently said the bike course would be 90 kilometers and even on race day the announcers kept saying that we had biked 56 miles. Making the course a bit long was necessary and no-one had the right to complain about that, it needed to be that way to accommodate the start location and getting to the park for T2 but it was not necessary to systematically and intentionally give false information about the distance of the bike course. In the results the paces are calculated based on 94 kilometers which I was happy to see but it wouldn’t have killed anyone to start saying that the bike course would be 94 kilometers long 12 months ago. For me this was really frustrating, especially when we got to 90 kilometers on the bike and there was no sign, it was like the organizers just tried to gloss over the problem and tried to fool the athletes as well. Absolutely every single one of them knew afterwards that the bike course was not 90 kilometers so how does it help you to keep that information hidden?
  • Bike Aid Stations – Powerade bottles with screw tops wasn’t the best plan. Powerade does make bottle with drinking tops, why not get those? Having the volunteers spaced out over a few hundred yards was nice and gives an opportunity to grab more than one thing which lots of races ignore… well done. Location of Aid #1 was good although a sign prior to the corner would have been nice (or I just missed it). Putting an aid station at the bottom of a downhill (Aid #2) was a poor decision especially considering that there were gradual uphills prior to and after the aid station where it could have been. The speed of the downhill is dangerous. Also, putting cones on the centerline was downright dangerous here. This was made worse by the fact that the volunteers were moving out from the curb of the road to hand things off. Aid stations need to be kept as wide as possible so that people can move around if they don’t need things, athletes will move to the curb if they have to. Putting this on an uphill would probably solve all the problems at once.
  • T2. Excellent layout again. Neon spraypaint on the curb that we had to step up would have been nice, less likely to stumble. Volunteers were very helpful with directions.
  • Run Course – Excellent layout provided a good place for spectators to see people come past multiple times. Curving chute to the finish wasn’t as nice as a straightaway but I don’t think there are any straight parts of anything in that park so you can’t really solve that. Very challenging especially with the heat.
  • Run Aid Stations – Recyclable cups was great! Keeping water cold was obviously a problem, but this is important so an effort should be made to do that. Some Aid stations were well spaced out like the bike ones but others were jammed right together. I spent much of my run passing people from previous waves and watched as many of them stopped and looked in the cups the volunteers were holding before grabbing them, obviously they weren’t familiar with shouting what they wanted. Putting signs prior to all aid stations that say “shout what you want” probably would help with congestion and efficiency and less dropped cups of incorrect beverage.
  • Finish – Finish line announcer could have used some more information. Giving an opportunity for athletes to submit a few words about themselves is a nice touch at many races and makes the announcer much more enjoyable to listen to for all the spectators as they feel like the athletes become people. I heard lots of people cracking jokes about copying the idea for a belt buckle medal from the marathon in town. I think it’s great, make it a Calgary tradition not just a Calgary marathon tradition. The food selection at the finish was a bit odd, once I had finally cooled myself down with ice from the medical tent I was craving grease so the pizza was fine but that’s a rare occurrence for myself, having something a bit healthier would have been nice.
  • Awards – Good work at trying to make the process move quickly, it’s rarely possible to make it efficient but this was rather close. I really liked hearing from the pros, maybe it would have been possible to prompt them with a couple questions. Ask them to describe their day, what they liked about the course and what they found challenging, the spectators might know how things played out but for those of us who are racing we have no clue… but we’re interested!
Related Posts with Thumbnails
You might also like: